Pain Is Not Inevitable, Neither Is Suffering; For Pain Is But a Feeling

Have you ever professed my preferred mantra, “I’m Great! All the time!” and received the rejoiner, “How can you be great, even when you are in great pain?” Yeah, me, too. People tauntingly query  me all the time, “How can you be as great as you claim when there is so much pain and suffering in the world.” To each and all of them, I explain, “It’s all a matter of your definition of “Greatness!” and specifically, when faced with pain, it’s all about how you define the pain you face and how you respond to it.

Many dispute the origin of the quote, “Pain is inevitable, suffering it optional.” Some attribute it to Buddha, others to the Dali Lama; at least one source says Haruki Murakami, a self-styled modern Japanese writer said it first. Regardless, of who said it or says it when, I believe the statement is wrong, because I believe the premise that “pain is inevitable” is wrong and I reject it — all the time.

Almost forty years ago, in my first year of my aborted medical education (I left after my second year – a decision that still at times causes me pain), my Dorland’s Pocket Medical Dictionary taught me, “Pain is a feeling of distress, suffering, or agony, caused by stimulation of specialized nerve endings.” Medicine, up that generation at least, limited pain to physical sensation. Modern medicine, however, now includes in the definition the body-mind-spirit triad of pain. Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary medically defines pain as:

a: a state of physical, emotional, or mental lack of well-being or physical, emotional, or mental uneasiness that ranges from mild discomfort or dull distress to acute often unbearable agony, may be generalized or localized, and is the consequence of being injured or hurt physically or mentally or of some derangement of or lack of equilibrium in the physical or mental functions (as through disease), and that usually produces a reaction of wanting to avoid, escape, or destroy the causative factor and its effects
b: a basic bodily sensation that is induced by a noxious stimulus, is received by naked nerve endings, is characterized by physical discomfort (as pricking, throbbing, or aching), and typically leads to evasive action.

Webster’s both rightly and wrongly describes pain as “a state of … lack of well-being or … uneasiness that … is the consequence of … [a] lack of equilibrium in the physical or mental functions … that usually produces a reaction of wanting to avoid, escape, or destroy the causative factor and its effects ….” It is right in its first two-third, that pain is but a feeling, a lack of well-being or an uneasiness caused by inequalibrium; but it is wrong in embracing the idea that pain should produce a “fight or flight” response to cause of one’s pain.

You need neither fight nor flee the cause of your pain. Rather, you can, if you so desire, use the P10 Principle to embrace and affirmatively relate with and respond to the cause of your pain.

In Man’s Search for Meaning, Dr. Viktor Frankl wrote about the psychological impacts of life as a prisoner in the Nazi concentration camps of World War II. Like many of my paternal ancestors’ relatives, Frankl’s mother, father, brother, and pregnant wife were all killed in the camps. His captors took virtually everything of personal value and basic human dignity from him. The sole thing the Nazis could not strip from him, however, was his choice as to how to respond to the deprivation, degradation, and trauma to which he was subjected. Frankl meaningfully chose to focus his energies on “owning” that small but vital space between the noxious stimulus received by his naked nerve endings and his response to it. Frankl’s ability to retain his energetic, emotional, and intellectual autonomy in the most horrific circumstances imaginable provides a near-perfect example of the value of having intrapersonal strength and grace under extreme duress to use one’s power of personal choice to use one’s precious resources of self, time, effort, energy, emotion, intellect, property, and people to embrace one’s pain and decide to make something inherently positive out of something inherently negative instead of fleeing or fighting that which in the present circumstances can neither be fought nor fled.

For, as Frankl is often quoted, “Between stimulus and response there is a space. In that space is our power to choose our response. In our response lies our growth and our freedom.”

[reminder]Do you have the Greatness! to embrace and relate with your pain?[/reminder]

 

Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 10

We Are the World Album Cover
We Are the World Album Cover

 

How many of you remember the fantastic ensemble singing the song, We are the World? Where did Lionel Ritchie and Michael Jackson come up with that idea? Continue reading “Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 10”

Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 7

In Part 6 of this series of posts on prioritizing your relationships, I described Bentham’s take on utilitarianism and advocated using his seven factors as part of a method for deciding what is the globally optimal developmental choice in each moment. Doing this requires considering as many as possible of the Bentham’s utilitarian relevant factors of intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity or remoteness, fecundity, purity, and extent.

Bentham balances almost everything in terms of Continue reading “Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 7”

Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 6

“In case of emergency,” the flight attendant tells us, “oxygen masks will appear from the overhead bins. Put on your own oxygen mask first and then assist those around you in putting on theirs.” “In case of emergency,” the cruise ship’s purser tells us, “put on your own life jacket and then help others put on theirs and proceed to your designated emergency area.”

“Don’t wait for an emergency!” I say. “Practice persistently taking care of your self first, so you can best take care of those to whom and for your values make you responsible.” Why? Continue reading “Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 6”

Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 5

In Part 4 of this series of posts about prioritizing your relationships, we discussed why and how God comes first, then you, and we left off saying next comes a close family triad level comprised of your parent(s), your spouse, and your child(ren). The three parts of this triad come and go and shift priorities as they do so. Continue reading “Prioritizing Your Relationships – Part 5”